Digital Athena
  • Blog
  • Essays and Book Reviews
  • Contact Us
  • About Digital Athena
  • Index of Essays and Reviews

Texts and the Texter

10/25/2011

0 Comments

 
 “We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us,” Winston Churchill observed about the symbiotic relationship between our architecture and ourselves. The same may be said for how we interact with our technologies.

Take a look at texting. The numbers seem to grow all the time but as of the Kaiser Foundation Study published in January 2010, young people were sending on average 3000 texts per month and were spending four times the amount of time texting than they were actually talking on their phones. And texting has created has influenced communications in several ways:

First of all, because people text on their cellphones, most must use a virtual keyboard on a touchscreen (Blackberry owners get to use the tiny physical keys, which is slightly more user friendly, I suppose.). In either case, the keys are much smaller than the average computer keyboard’s keys, so it’s easy to make mistakes. Plus, using the virtual keyboard also creates another level of awkwardness because you have to shift to a second (and on some cellphones a third) view to access all the characters on the QWERTY keyboard. In addition texting has the “short message service” limitation of 160 characters.

Then there’s the speed at which the communication is sent. Texts are delivered pretty much instantaneously. This leads people to think that they must respond at roughly the same speed. Delaying a response seems for many to imply that you’re ignoring the person contacted you.

The combination of a virtual awkward keyboard, the limited length, and the pressure to rapidly respond engenders the kind of shorthand of contracted words (Xlnt for excellent, rite for write), pictograms (b4 for before, @om for atom), initializations (N for no, LOL for laughing out loud, CWOT for complete waste of time), and nonstandard acronyms (anfscd for and now for something completely different, btdt for been there, done that, hhoj for ha, ha, only joking. Notice how the shorthand becomes more and more cryptic and we haven’t even talked about the emoticons—those variations on the ubiquitous smiley face using strings of punctuation

I know I’m old—way over thirty—but texting seems to me like the new pig Latin—another code designed to communicate secretly and to exclude others. In the case of pig Latin, the aim was to exclude parents. And for some ages the same may be true to today’s texting. It’s a silent and secret form of communication one can do in one’s lap under the dinner table. So essentially the technology of sending written messages via cell phones creates private languages.

Texting can be a convenient way to quickly notify someone, but the effects, especially for younger people, can be more far-reaching and burdensome and hardly convenient. Sherry Turkle met with one sixteen-year-old named Sanjay during her research for her new book Alone/Together. He expressed anxiety and frustration around texting. He turned off his phone while he spoke with Turkle for an hour. Turkle writes: “At the end of our conversation, he turns his phone back on. He looks at me ruefully, almost embarrassed. He has received over a hundred text messages as were speaking. Some are from his girlfriend, who, he says, “is having a meltdown.” Some are from a group of close friends trying to organize a small concert. He feels a lot of pressure to reply to both situations and begins to pick up his books and laptop so he can find a quiet place to set himself to the task. . . . “I can’t imagine doing this when I get older.” And then, more quietly, “How long do I have to continue doing this?” Sounds more like he’s facing a prison sentence rather than the joy of continuous connection  . . .

0 Comments

Does Google Really “Dominate Us?

10/3/2011

1 Comment

 
In a recent  New York Review of Books (August 18th, 2011), James Gleick discusses how Google dominates us in a review of four new books about Google. The books vary in their approach and general content, as the titles indicate:

In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works, and Shapes Our Lives by Steven Levy

I’m Feeling Lucky: The Confessions of Google Employee Number 59 by Douglas Edwards

The Googlization of Everything (and Why We Should Worry!) by Siva Vaidhyanathan

Search and Destroy: Why You Can’t Trust Google Inc. by Scott Cleland with Ira Brodsky

Rather than a comprehensive review of the books, Gleick’s essay describes the early history of Google, some of its technological innovations, a few of its scrapes with the law regarding privacy, and just how comprehensive its knowledge of individuals is. Along the way he makes a couple of really interesting points:

Gleick says that no one really understands very well how and how much Google has changed the information economy.  But he observes that the products, the merchandise, of this new economy are not information itself but attention. “These commodities have an inverse relationship. When information is cheap, attention becomes expensive.” What Google sells is the attention that we as users willingly give to it.

For businesses, Google provides a way to more effectively target their ads by matching their keywords to users’ search history. The company justifies this to the users by saying that it is helping marketers better understand what a user might be looking for. But in fact it uses advanced artificial intelligence, which in this case is targeted advertising, to entice a huge and enthusiastic advertising base to sign up for its services. And by making the terms based on pay-per-click rather pay for ad placement and by monitoring what users clicked on what ads, they offer the quantitative evaluation of the success of ads that businesses have long sought. As John Wanamaker, an early department store merchant, observed, “ Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don’t know which half.” It’s a problem that has plagued businesses for a long time, so Google’s finding an answer constitutes a major breakthrough.

Gleick finds the basis for Google’s domination in Siva Vaidhyananthan’s The Googlization of Everything (and Why We Should Worry).  Basically they both argue that Google “dominates” us because it tracks our searches and the ads we click on. The company claims it uses that information to deliver better search results and ads to individual users based on the interests and biases they exhibit in their searching and advertising interests. But then it also uses that information in the aggregate to help advertisers better target prospective customers and makes a lot of money in the process.

Actually I don’t find that Google dominates its users in this way. It certainly dominates the online advertising business, with 41% of all online revenue flowing into its coffers. And it dominates the search engine business, being by far the most popular search site out there. And it's trying to dominate other online business arenas as well. But it doesn’t really dominate its users. What it actually does is exploit which, which I think may well be worse.

1 Comment

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    December 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009

    Categories

    All
    AI
    Computer Models
    Convergence
    Digital Software
    Division Of Labor
    E Readers
    Facebook
    Financial Markets
    Google
    Innovation Business Cycle
    Internet
    Knowledge
    Learning
    Media Use
    Myths
    Powerpoint
    Robots
    Screen Life
    Screen Life
    Search
    Social Networking
    Targeted Marketing
    Technology And Jobs
    The Nature Of The Digital
    The Nature Of The Digital
    Video Games
    Web 2.0
    Wikis
    Youth

    Cynthia's Blog Plan

    I'll aim to post here a few times a month, based on current events and my ongoing research.